James Bainbridge

33, Male Custodial - 4m - Suspended

York, North Yorkshire

Offender ID: ad3c4d11-c211-473a-9df6-d966fcacd235

No photo on file
Can you help identify this person?

Photos must already appear on a published news article. You must provide a link to the source article so we can verify it shows the correct individual.

Offence Summary

A man breached his sexual harm prevention order by using his partner’s phone and tablet without informing police, and by using Snapchat software that does not retain internet history.

Full Description

James Bainbridge, 33, was sentenced at York Magistrates’ Court for four breaches of a sexual harm prevention order (SHPO) imposed after his conviction last July for grooming a child for sexual activity online. The court heard that Bainbridge, who is required to inform police of any internet-enabled device he possesses or uses, failed to disclose his partner’s phone and tablet. The devices were discovered during a routine monitoring visit by officers.

Prosecutor James Harrison told the court that the conditions of the SHPO included a requirement that Bainbridge must notify police about any device capable of accessing the internet, and he was prohibited from using software that deletes browsing history or fails to retain it. When police attended his home, his partner said he had been using her phone and tablet. Bainbridge had not reported either device. The phone was handed over immediately, but the tablet was initially missing; Bainbridge, who had been absent on arrival, later returned and retrieved it.

Both devices had the Snapchat application installed and active. Snapchat is a messaging service that automatically deletes messages and does not retain full internet history, making it incompatible with the order’s restrictions. Bainbridge, of Burnsall Drive, Holgate, York, pleaded guilty to two counts of failing to notify police about his use of an internet device and two counts of using software that does not retain internet history.

Defence solicitor Kevin Blount argued that the breaches arose from naivety rather than a deliberate bid to evade the order. He said that, like many partners, Bainbridge and his girlfriend had shared each other’s passwords; she has since changed hers and not disclosed the new ones. Police conducted initial examinations of the phone after his arrest and no further offences beyond the breaches were charged, the court was told.

The magistrates considered the breaches serious enough for immediate custody but suspended the prison term. “We have suspended it because you are making good progress with the probation service,” they said. Bainbridge received a 16-week prison sentence suspended for 12 months. He was also ordered to pay £85 prosecution costs and a £154 statutory surcharge.

The court heard that Bainbridge had been given a two-year community order in July with 200 hours of unpaid work, 25 days of rehabilitative activities, and a rehabilitation programme. A probation officer told the court that he had completed the unpaid work and rehabilitative activities and was continuing with the 26-week programme.

Location

City: York
County: North Yorkshire
Address: Burnsall Drive

Case Details

Police Force: North Yorkshire Police
Sentence Length: 4 months (Custodial)

Name heritage (predicted origin)

Country: United Kingdom
Confidence: 95%

Special Thanks

A huge thank you to North Yorkshire Police for their tireless dedication in bringing this offender to justice. Your commitment and hard work truly help keep our communities safe, and we are deeply grateful.

Source: yorkpress.co.uk

Request a correction or removal

If anything on this page is inaccurate, out of date, or should no longer be published — for example, if an appeal has been granted, a conviction overturned, or reporting restrictions apply — please let us know and we will review it promptly.

Requests are reviewed by our team. Where a valid reason is provided we will remedy the situation as quickly as possible. Please include any supporting evidence or official source links to help us act fast.

Support Survivors

Behind every case is a real victim

Please consider donating to one of the UK's leading charities supporting survivors and preventing abuse. Two fantastic organisations making a real difference.

Important notice — this is not an official register

sexoffenders.co.uk is an independent, unofficial publication. We are not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, any government body, police force, or official sex offenders register. We research, write about, and republish information drawn from cases already reported in the media, published in court records, or released by police forces. We disclose our source for each entry where available.

Whilst we take care to be accurate, we cannot guarantee the completeness, currency, or ongoing accuracy of any information. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Users must not use information from this site to harass, intimidate, threaten, or otherwise harm any individual. Any such conduct may be unlawful.

If you believe any information is inaccurate, out of date, or requires removal for legal reasons (including reporting restrictions or matters involving a child), please use the correction form on the relevant offender page, or refer to our Privacy Policy for how to contact us. We will review all reports promptly.

By using this website you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.