Thomas David Curry

19, Male Custodial - 12m - Suspended 2024-11-01

Burnopfield, County Durham

Offender ID: ac779354-211c-4d22-844b-ee7f76a0cbc1

No photo on file
Can you help identify this person?

Photos must already appear on a published news article. You must provide a link to the source article so we can verify it shows the correct individual.

Offence Summary

Thomas David Curry, a 19-year-old university student from County Durham, was sentenced for breaching his Sexual Risk Order and sex offender notification requirements by using aliases to access a paedophilic computer game containing over 400 prohibited images of children.

Full Description

A 19-year-old university student from Burnopfield, County Durham, appeared at Durham Crown Court after admitting to multiple breaches related to his status as a registered sex offender. Thomas David Curry, previously convicted in July 2024 for possessing over 200 indecent images of children and 72 prohibited images, had been placed under a 24-month community order, including 50 rehabilitation activity days to address his sexual proclivities. He was also subjected to a five-year sex offender registration and a Sexual Risk Order imposed by magistrates shortly after his conviction, which restricted his internet activities.

Despite these measures, Curry returned to court having pleaded guilty to three counts of failing to comply with sex offender notification requirements, three counts of breaching the Sexual Risk Order, and one count of possessing prohibited images of children. Prosecuting, Kathryn Wetherley explained that police discovered Curry had used three aliases to access internet sites without notifying authorities within the required three days. This allowed him to engage with paedophilic computer games featuring more than 400 life-like, computer-generated prohibited images of children aged five and upwards. An examination of his seized laptop revealed he had played the game on 34 occasions, earning 'achievements' for his progress.

In mitigation, defence barrister Lucy Todd acknowledged that the offences crossed the custodial threshold but argued for a suspended sentence, citing a realistic prospect of rehabilitation. She highlighted Curry's vulnerabilities, deep remorse, and shame, noting his significant ill-health and recent admission of a sexual attraction to children, which demonstrated increased maturity. Todd emphasised that Curry was turning away from the 'digital realm' and was willing to work actively with the Probation Service, despite previous inadequate engagement. She described him as a young man who had taken the wrong path but was at a turning point.

Recorder Ian Mullarkey, addressing Curry, criticised his deliberate concealment of the paedophilic game under a different file name and accused him of believing he was immune to court orders. The judge noted that Curry had minimised and justified his offending during Probation Service interviews, while understanding he was awaiting assessments for autism and ADHD. Imposing a 12-month sentence in a young offenders' institution, suspended for 18 months, the Recorder required Curry to complete 26 rehabilitation activity days and 200 hours of unpaid work. He also extended Curry's existing community order by six months, warning: 'Mr Curry, this is really your final opportunity to take advantage of the assistance available to address the underlying causes of your offending behaviour. If you don't comply, you'll go to prison.' The case was reported by The Northern Echo on 18 November 2024.

Location

City: Burnopfield
County: County Durham
Address: The Copse

Case Details

Police Force: Durham Constabulary
Sentence Length: 12 months (Custodial)

Name heritage (predicted origin)

Country: United Kingdom
Confidence: 90%

Special Thanks

A huge thank you to Durham Constabulary for their tireless dedication in bringing this offender to justice. Your commitment and hard work truly help keep our communities safe, and we are deeply grateful.

Source: thenorthernecho.co.uk

Request a correction or removal

If anything on this page is inaccurate, out of date, or should no longer be published — for example, if an appeal has been granted, a conviction overturned, or reporting restrictions apply — please let us know and we will review it promptly.

Requests are reviewed by our team. Where a valid reason is provided we will remedy the situation as quickly as possible. Please include any supporting evidence or official source links to help us act fast.

Support Survivors

Behind every case is a real victim

Please consider donating to one of the UK's leading charities supporting survivors and preventing abuse. Two fantastic organisations making a real difference.

Important notice — this is not an official register

sexoffenders.co.uk is an independent, unofficial publication. We are not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, any government body, police force, or official sex offenders register. We research, write about, and republish information drawn from cases already reported in the media, published in court records, or released by police forces. We disclose our source for each entry where available.

Whilst we take care to be accurate, we cannot guarantee the completeness, currency, or ongoing accuracy of any information. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Users must not use information from this site to harass, intimidate, threaten, or otherwise harm any individual. Any such conduct may be unlawful.

If you believe any information is inaccurate, out of date, or requires removal for legal reasons (including reporting restrictions or matters involving a child), please use the correction form on the relevant offender page, or refer to our Privacy Policy for how to contact us. We will review all reports promptly.

By using this website you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.