Philip Robinson

Philip Robinson, a 53-year-old resident of Wigan, Greater Manchester, faced serious charges related to the possession of child sexual abuse material and extreme pornography. He appeared before borough justices, where he pleaded guilty to possessing 22 images of children being sexually abused, all classified in the most severe Category A. In addition, Robinson confessed to holding 12 Category B films and 36 Category C films of similar content, alongside 197 films showing humans engaging in sexual intercourse with animals.

The case was committed to Bolton Crown Court for sentencing. On an unspecified date in late 2025, the judge imposed a 12-month custodial sentence, which was suspended for 18 months. This decision spared Robinson immediate imprisonment, but he was subjected to stringent conditions to prevent reoffending. He was ordered to complete 150 hours of unpaid work and 30 days of rehabilitation activities. Furthermore, Robinson must register as a sex offender for 10 years and is bound by a sexual harm prevention order for the same duration, restricting his access to certain materials and activities.

According to reports from Wigan Today, published on 17 December 2025, the discovery of these materials on Robinson's computer highlighted the ongoing efforts by authorities to combat the possession and distribution of child exploitation content. The article detailed how the case underscores the legal consequences under UK law for such offences, with Category A images carrying the heaviest penalties due to their graphic nature. No specific details were provided on how the materials came to the attention of law enforcement, but the guilty plea indicates that investigations likely involved digital forensics.

• Possession of 22 Category A child abuse images
• Possession of 12 Category B and 36 Category C child abuse films
• Possession of 197 bestiality films

The sentencing reflects a balance between punishment and rehabilitation, as the judge deemed Robinson suitable for community-based measures rather than immediate custody. This outcome was reported amid broader discussions on protecting vulnerable children from exploitation in the digital age.