Lord Nazir Ahmed

64, Male Custodial - 5y 6m

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

Offender ID: 73df2ae3-8138-4341-acae-f95c90c78349

No photo on file
Can you help identify this person?

Photos must already appear on a published news article. You must provide a link to the source article so we can verify it shows the correct individual.

Offence Summary

Lord Nazir Ahmed was convicted of attempting to rape a young girl and committing buggery against a boy under 11 in the early 1970s when he was a teenager, and was jailed for five years and six months.

Full Description

A disgraced former peer of the realm, Lord Nazir Ahmed, has been sentenced to over five years in prison for historic sexual offences committed against two children in Rotherham during the early 1970s. The 64-year-old, who retains the title Lord Ahmed of Rotherham despite resigning from the House of Lords, was found guilty in January at Sheffield Crown Court of two counts of attempted rape and one count of buggery. These crimes occurred when Ahmed was approximately 16 or 17 years old.

The offences came to light decades later following complaints made to the police in 2016. A female victim recounted to the jury how Ahmed attempted to rape her when she was much younger than him, describing the incident as a profound trauma that left her with overwhelming shame throughout her childhood and early adult years. In her victim personal statement read in court, she stated: "An overwhelming feeling of shame remained with me throughout my childhood and early adult years. It was a burden I was made to carry, and it silenced me for many years. It is now time for me to pass that burden to him – the paedophile who I know feels no personal shame." She further noted that Ahmed had now been publicly shamed for his actions.

Ahmed was also convicted of a serious sexual assault, specifically buggery, against a boy under the age of 11 during the same period. The male complainant, in his victim personal statement, detailed the lasting impact of the abuse, saying: "Being sexually abused by [the three men] has affected me on a daily basis and left me unable to show affection to my own children. I buried the abuse and carried it with me on my own for years and years. I feel shame because of what these men did to me. This is not about revenge, this is about justice." During the trial, the jury heard a recording of a telephone call between the two complainants, prompted by the man's email to the woman stating: "I have evidence against that paedophile." The prosecution, led by Tom Little QC, presented this evidence to corroborate the victims' accounts.

On Friday, Mr Justice Lavender sentenced Ahmed to five years and six months' imprisonment, comprising three and a half years for the buggery offence and two concurrent years for each attempted rape. The judge emphasised the profound and lifelong effects of Ahmed's actions, stating: "Your actions have had profound and lifelong effects on the girl and the boy, who have lived with what you did to them for between 46 and 53 years. Their statements express more eloquently than I ever could how your actions have affected their lives in so many different and damaging ways." The sentence was determined in line with legal guidelines applicable to offences committed at the time, reflecting the historical context of the crimes.

In mitigation, Imran Khan QC argued that Ahmed had devoted his life to public service and that his fall from grace had occurred in the full glare of publicity, including calls for him to be stripped of his title. He noted: "That very good reputation he had has gone." The case was adjourned for six weeks to assess whether Ahmed could cover prosecution costs. Notably, Ahmed had previously resigned from the House of Lords in November 2020 following a conduct committee report that found he had sexually assaulted a vulnerable woman seeking his help, making him the first peer recommended for expulsion.

The article, reported by the PA News Agency and published in the Darlington and Stockton Times, highlights the severity of the offences and the courage of the victims in coming forward after decades. Ahmed's two older brothers, Mohammed Farouq and Mohammed Tariq, faced related charges but were deemed unfit to stand trial and received absolute discharges.

Location

City: Rotherham
County: South Yorkshire

Case Details

Police Force: South Yorkshire Police

Name heritage (predicted origin)

Country: Pakistan
Confidence: 80%

Special Thanks

A huge thank you to South Yorkshire Police for their tireless dedication in bringing this offender to justice. Your commitment and hard work truly help keep our communities safe, and we are deeply grateful.

Source: darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk

Request a correction or removal

If anything on this page is inaccurate, out of date, or should no longer be published — for example, if an appeal has been granted, a conviction overturned, or reporting restrictions apply — please let us know and we will review it promptly.

Requests are reviewed by our team. Where a valid reason is provided we will remedy the situation as quickly as possible. Please include any supporting evidence or official source links to help us act fast.

Support Survivors

Behind every case is a real victim

Please consider donating to one of the UK's leading charities supporting survivors and preventing abuse. Two fantastic organisations making a real difference.

Important notice — this is not an official register

sexoffenders.co.uk is an independent, unofficial publication. We are not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, any government body, police force, or official sex offenders register. We research, write about, and republish information drawn from cases already reported in the media, published in court records, or released by police forces. We disclose our source for each entry where available.

Whilst we take care to be accurate, we cannot guarantee the completeness, currency, or ongoing accuracy of any information. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Users must not use information from this site to harass, intimidate, threaten, or otherwise harm any individual. Any such conduct may be unlawful.

If you believe any information is inaccurate, out of date, or requires removal for legal reasons (including reporting restrictions or matters involving a child), please use the correction form on the relevant offender page, or refer to our Privacy Policy for how to contact us. We will review all reports promptly.

By using this website you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.