Full Description
Suggest update
Ailean Kerr, a 48-year-old man from Elgin, Scotland, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison after being found guilty of sexual offences involving communications with individuals he believed to be 13-year-old girls. Kerr, who presented himself as a 'paedophile hunter' conducting his own vigilante operation to trap predators, was instead exposed by a vigilante group using decoys. The case unfolded at Inverness Sheriff Court, where a jury unanimously rejected his defence and convicted him on two charges: attempting to cause an older child to view sexual images and attempting to communicate indecently with an older child. These offences occurred between November 2020 and January 2021.
The court heard that Kerr had sent indecent photographs and engaged in explicit conversations with the decoys, who were adults posing as underage girls. Despite his claims of honourable intentions to catch 'perverts', the evidence presented convinced the jury that his actions were motivated by sexual gratification. Sheriff Ian Cruickshank, presiding over the trial, described Kerr's defence as 'pathetic' and emphasised the importance of protecting children from online predators. 'You tried to advance a defence which was quite simply pathetic and that you knew that they were adults,' the sheriff stated during sentencing. 'Your position in the report shows that you do not accept responsibility which is not unusual. But it is absolutely essential that children are protected by the court from predators online.'
A social work background report submitted to the court added a layer of controversy, as the author appeared to accept Kerr's explanation that his actions were not sexually motivated and that he knew he was communicating with adults. The report noted that Kerr had convinced the social worker of his 'honourable' intentions and that he was now focusing on exposing loan sharks. However, Sheriff Cruickshank criticised this assessment, highlighting the discrepancy with the jury's unanimous verdict. 'The difficulty is that the social worker seems to have accepted his explanation which the jury rejected unanimously,' the sheriff remarked. 'He has not been deemed suitable for the 'Moving Forward to Change' (sex offender's) programme. She is in agreement that they were not sexually motivated which is exactly what he was convicted of.'
Kerr's defence counsel, Bill Adam, acknowledged the jury's decision, stating: 'He accepts he did what he did and the jury's verdict. It doesn't matter what the social worker makes of his position, it is what the jury makes of his explanation and the court can proceed to sentence. He is deemed at low risk of offending.' Despite this, the court proceeded with a custodial sentence of 15 months, and Kerr was placed on the Sex Offenders Register for 10 years. The case, reported by Grampian Online on 10 December 2024, underscores the risks of unauthorised vigilante activities and the judiciary's firm stance on sexual offences against children.