Jack Watkin

26, Male Custodial - 6y 2025-10-06

Alderley Edge, Cheshire

Offender ID: 44c480f5-c492-41bb-a372-ee97d32f00e4

No photo on file
Can you help identify this person?

Photos must already appear on a published news article. You must provide a link to the source article so we can verify it shows the correct individual.

Release status
Approximately 1,310 days until expected release (October 2029)
Guideline: two-thirds served for sentences ≥4 years; half otherwise (England & Wales). Estimates only.

Offence Summary

Jack Watkin was jailed for six years after perpetrating a luxury handbags fraud scam that defrauded victims of over £195,000 and for possessing and making indecent images of children found on his phone.

Full Description

Jack Watkin, a 26-year-old from Alderley Edge in Cheshire, has been sentenced to six years in prison at Chester Crown Court for a series of fraudulent activities and child sexual offences. Dubbed the 'Kardashian of Cheshire' due to his ostentatious lifestyle portrayed on social media, Watkin conned friends, acquaintances, and even his own father out of substantial sums of money under the pretence of lucrative investments in luxury Hermes handbags.

Between April 2019 and October 2021, Watkin, who had no job or legitimate income, amassed £1.2 million in expenditures, including a £140,000 bill at London's Dorchester Hotel, fast cars, designer clothing, and luxury goods like Versace crockery. He pleaded guilty to six counts of fraud totalling more than £195,000. His victims included close friend Hannah Jakes, from whom he defrauded £98,500; Christine Colbert, owner of Dress Cheshire in Prestbury Village, who lost £43,800; his father Jason Watkin, a company chief executive, who was defrauded of £24,500; James Irlam, scammed of over £13,000; Harrods barman Andor Farkas, who lost £14,000; and Naheem Akhtar, defrauded of £840 for non-delivered Lora Piana shoes.

  • Hannah Jakes described their 10-year friendship as 'a complete lie', calling Watkin 'jealous, greedy and narcissistic' in her victim personal statement.
  • Christine Colbert, who read her statement in court, felt 'ashamed, foolish, stupid and sick', stating that Watkin had 'groomed and took advantage of my good nature' and attempted to steal her credibility and livelihood. She warned others on Instagram but faced threats from Watkin, who dubbed her 'the Witch of Prestbury'.
  • Jason Watkin hoped his son would reflect on the 'enormous damage' caused to victims and family.
  • Andor Farkas was left in a 'dire financial situation', accusing Watkin of 'knowingly manipulated and deceived him, leaving him in crisis and showing no remorse whatsoever'.

In addition to the fraud, Watkin was found guilty by a jury of possessing and making indecent images of children, discovered on his phone following his arrest for the fraud offences. On 6 October 2025, Judge Simon Berkson sentenced him to four and a half years for the fraud and an additional 18 months for the indecent images offences, to run consecutively, totalling six years. The judge remarked: 'You used an outward persona of someone who was wealthy and well connected in order to dupe victims with your fraudulent behaviour. You described yourself as a millionaire and talked about your knowledge of luxury products. You suggested you could be a person who could be trusted with other people’s money. Your true motivation was to defraud people out of their money and spend it all on yourself.'

Watkin's defence, represented by Rebecca Caulfield, argued that the enterprise was not fraudulent from the outset and that he believed it would fund his lifestyle, but it spiralled out of control. She highlighted his 'lack of emotional maturity' and a suggested link to his autism, noting his 'genuine remorse'. However, Detective Constable Gareth Yates of Cheshire Constabulary’s economic crime unit described Watkin as someone who 'deluded himself that he was a successful rich kid influencer' but was in reality 'stealing money from wealthy individuals under the guise of ‘business opportunities’ to fund his expensive habit... and his perversions'. Watkin, who appeared in the 2016 Channel 4 documentary Rich Kids of Instagram, was declared bankrupt before his sentencing.

This case, reported by PA Media and covered in The Standard on 6 October 2025, underscores the dangers of social media facades and the severe consequences of financial and sexual crimes.

Location

City: Alderley Edge
County: Cheshire

Case Details

Police Force: Cheshire Constabulary
Sentence Length: 6 years (Custodial)
Expected Release: October 2029
Guideline: two-thirds served for sentences ≥4 years; half otherwise (England & Wales). Estimates only.
Full Sentence End: October 2031
If served in full. Estimates only.

Name heritage (predicted origin)

Country: United Kingdom
Confidence: 95%

Special Thanks

A huge thank you to Cheshire Constabulary for their tireless dedication in bringing this offender to justice. Your commitment and hard work truly help keep our communities safe, and we are deeply grateful.

Source: standard.co.uk

Request a correction or removal

If anything on this page is inaccurate, out of date, or should no longer be published — for example, if an appeal has been granted, a conviction overturned, or reporting restrictions apply — please let us know and we will review it promptly.

Requests are reviewed by our team. Where a valid reason is provided we will remedy the situation as quickly as possible. Please include any supporting evidence or official source links to help us act fast.

Support Survivors

Behind every case is a real victim

Please consider donating to one of the UK's leading charities supporting survivors and preventing abuse. Two fantastic organisations making a real difference.

Important notice — this is not an official register

sexoffenders.co.uk is an independent, unofficial publication. We are not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, any government body, police force, or official sex offenders register. We research, write about, and republish information drawn from cases already reported in the media, published in court records, or released by police forces. We disclose our source for each entry where available.

Whilst we take care to be accurate, we cannot guarantee the completeness, currency, or ongoing accuracy of any information. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Users must not use information from this site to harass, intimidate, threaten, or otherwise harm any individual. Any such conduct may be unlawful.

If you believe any information is inaccurate, out of date, or requires removal for legal reasons (including reporting restrictions or matters involving a child), please use the correction form on the relevant offender page, or refer to our Privacy Policy for how to contact us. We will review all reports promptly.

By using this website you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.