Alex Patrick Fairclough

25, Male Custodial - 1y 2006-03-01

Swanage, Dorset

Offender ID: 20908c70-2503-48f9-8325-3539b9e9d07f

Alex Patrick Fairclough
Release status
This offender is likely already released (expected: September 2006)
Guideline: ~75% served for ≥4 years, ~50% otherwise. Estimates only.

Offence Summary

Alex Patrick Fairclough was jailed for possessing and making indecent images of children and later failed in a legal bid to avoid eviction from his tenancy due to his convictions.

Full Description

Alex Patrick Fairclough, a 25-year-old IT consultant, was convicted of serious child pornography offences that led to his imprisonment and subsequent eviction proceedings. Working at Purbeck School in Wareham, Fairclough was arrested after authorities discovered several hundred indecent photographs of children on his home PC. The images, some described as the 'worst type imaginable', resulted in him admitting to 19 counts of making or possessing such material.

In March 2006, Fairclough was sentenced to one year in prison at a local court, as reported in a Dorset Echo article. The offences spanned from May 2001 to May 2004, during which time he resided at a property in Banks Cottages, Studland, near Swanage. Following his release, Fairclough's tenancy was transferred to another house in the same area in January 2005. However, when Raglan Housing Association learned of his convictions through a newspaper report, they initiated court action to evict him, citing concerns over resident safety and quality of life.

The initial eviction hearing took place at Southampton County Court, where Judge Burford QC granted an immediate possession order in favour of the housing association. Fairclough challenged this decision in the Court of Appeal in London, arguing that the offences predated his current tenancy and that his behaviour had not caused complaints from neighbours. His barrister, Richard Egleton, described Fairclough as a 'modern-day pariah' but contended that 'paedophiles have to be housed somewhere' and that the property was ideal, with no opposition from those potentially affected.

Dismissing the appeal on 1st November 2007, Lord Justice Moore-Bick, sitting with Lord Justice Chadwick and Lord Justice May, ruled that the timing of the crimes relative to the tenancy transfer was irrelevant. The judge emphasised that housing laws protect neighbours from tenants whose past conduct indicates they could be a 'serious nuisance', drawing parallels to other crimes like burglary or drug dealing. 'To put it bluntly, why should a tenant who was the mystery burglar responsible for thefts from houses in the area before he obtained a tenancy not be at risk of eviction when his identity is discovered and conviction follows?' Moore-Bick stated, affirming that Fairclough's crimes threatened residents' quality of life.

This case, reported by the Dorset Echo on 2nd November 2007, highlighted novel legal issues surrounding the eviction of convicted sex offenders from social housing. Dorset Police were involved in the initial investigation, though specific details of the arrest were not elaborated in court proceedings.

Location

City: Swanage
County: Dorset
Address: Banks Cottages

Case Details

Police Force: Dorset Police
Sentence Length: 1 year (Custodial)
Expected Release: September 2006
Guideline: ~75% served for ≥4 years, ~50% otherwise. Estimates only.
Full Sentence End: March 2007
If served in full. Estimates only.

Name heritage (predicted origin)

Country: United Kingdom
Confidence: 90%

Special Thanks

A huge thank you to Dorset Police for their tireless dedication in bringing this offender to justice. Your commitment and hard work truly help keep our communities safe, and we are deeply grateful.

Source: dorsetecho.co.uk

Important legal notice

This website publishes information obtained from public sources including courts and police. While we aim to keep information accurate and current, no warranty, assurance, or guarantee is given as to completeness, accuracy, or ongoing availability. Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice.

Users must not use information from this website to harass, intimidate, threaten, discriminate against, or otherwise harm any person. Any such conduct may be unlawful. If you believe any information is inaccurate or requires removal for legal reasons, contact [email protected] and we will review promptly.

By using this website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.