James Bird, a 40-year-old man from Gillingham, Kent, was sentenced to 16 months in prison after being found in possession of prohibited indecent images of children. The offence occurred shortly after his release from a previous custodial sentence in January 2025, during which he had been subject to strict monitoring conditions under an indefinite sexual harm prevention order (SHPO).
Bird's criminal history dates back to 2014, when he first appeared in court for multiple offences related to the making and distribution of child abuse images. This resulted in a community order and a five-year SHPO. However, in 2016, he breached the order by contacting children online to commit sexual offences, posing as a young female schoolchild on fake social media accounts. For these crimes, he received an extended sentence of 15 years at Preston Crown Court, comprising nine years' imprisonment and a six-year extended licence period, reflecting his classification as a dangerous offender.
Upon his release in January 2025, Bird was required to install eSafe monitoring software on all his electronic devices, including a laptop and tablet purchased in March 2025. In May 2025, Kent Police received information indicating that Bird had accessed prohibited material via an unknown app. Analysis of the seized devices revealed 20 banned images on the tablet, depicting children aged six to 14 being subjected to sexual acts by adults. Although the nature of the images—whether real, AI-generated, CGI, or cartoons—was unclear, the court determined they were of a type prohibited under Bird's SHPO.
During the sentencing hearing at Maidstone Crown Court on 9 January 2026, prosecutor Jeremy Kingsford outlined the breach, while defence counsel Tom Dunn argued that the images were cartoons or anime accessed accidentally from a Chinese website while searching for adult pornography. Dunn emphasised Bird's compliance with monitoring and claimed the access was due to carelessness rather than intent, noting the depicted subjects were not real children.
Judge Julian Smith rejected the defence's claims, citing Bird's extensive record of 57 offences and his demonstrated 'compulsive, obsessive and determined' sexual interest in children. 'What it demonstrates once again is why he is a risk. He has a compulsion, obsession, whatever it may be, to pursue images of this type and has done so again,' the judge stated. He described Bird as posing an 'exceptionally high risk' and imposed a concurrent 16-month custodial sentence, to be served alongside his recall to prison under the previous extended sentence, with release subject to Parole Board approval. Bird's indefinite SHPO and lifelong sex offender notification requirements remain in place.
The case was investigated by Kent Police, who seized the devices following the monitoring alert. Bird pleaded guilty to one charge of possessing prohibited images of a child. As a result of reoffending on licence, his sentence expiry date is now January 2031.