Thomas Neely

32, Male Custodial - 6y 2025-11-14

Baildon, West Yorkshire

Offender ID: 0d0893ef-493c-4b19-a284-24a0827069cb

No photo on file
Can you help identify this person?

Photos must already appear on a published news article. You must provide a link to the source article so we can verify it shows the correct individual.

Release status
Approximately 1,349 days until expected release (November 2029)
Guideline: two-thirds served for sentences ≥4 years; half otherwise (England & Wales). Estimates only.

Offence Summary

Thomas Neely, a 32-year-old man from Baildon, engaged in graphic online sexual communications with an undercover police officer posing as a 12-year-old girl, sending explicit images and videos while attempting to arrange a meeting for sexual activity.

Full Description

Thomas Neely, a 32-year-old resident of Baildon in West Yorkshire, was sentenced at Bradford Crown Court for a series of child sexual offences committed online. The case came to light after Neely initiated contact in September 2024 with an undercover police officer who was posing as a 12-year-old girl on a social media platform. Using the username 'fat guy', Neely quickly escalated the conversation to explicit sexual topics, expressing his desire to 'have some fun' and to be the girl's 'first'.

The communications moved to the Kik messaging app, where Neely sent a photograph of his penis and a video of himself performing a sexual act. He discussed meeting the supposed child in person, confirming his intention to engage in sexual activity with her. Neely also offered to teach the 'girl' about 'kinks' and fantasies, stating during the chat that if she had any, he could instruct her in them. This deeply troubling exchange demonstrated his clear intent to exploit a minor, as he believed the individual was genuinely 12 years old.

West Yorkshire Police traced Neely through his IP address, leading to a search of his home at Valley View, Baildon. Officers found bedding that matched items visible in the video Neely had sent. Additionally, Neely had attempted to delete apps from his smartphone to cover his tracks. The prosecution, led by Becky Jane, highlighted these actions as evidence of his guilt. It was revealed that Neely had a prior caution in 2016 for possessing an indecent image of a child, which the court deemed a significant aggravating factor.

At the hearing on 14 November 2025, Neely pleaded guilty to attempting to cause a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity, attempting to cause a child to watch a sexual act, attempting to engage in sexual communication, and attempting to arrange or facilitate the commission of a child sexual act. Recorder Jason Pitter KC, presiding over the case, remarked on the gravity of Neely's actions, stating: 'That is deeply, deeply troubling because you believed she was 12.' The judge noted that the explicit nature of the chats provided strong evidence of Neely's intention to carry out the offences had the girl been real. Despite considering Neely's personal circumstances and submissions from his barrister, the court imposed an immediate custodial sentence.

The sentencing reflects the seriousness of online grooming and child sexual exploitation cases in the UK, with Neely required to serve two-thirds of his term in custody. He will register as a sex offender for life and is subject to an indefinite sexual harm prevention order restricting his internet use and contact with children. This case underscores the vigilance of West Yorkshire Police in monitoring online predators.

Location

City: Baildon
County: West Yorkshire
Address: Valley View

Case Details

Police Force: West Yorkshire Police
Sentence Length: 6 years (Custodial)
Expected Release: November 2029
Guideline: two-thirds served for sentences ≥4 years; half otherwise (England & Wales). Estimates only.
Full Sentence End: November 2031
If served in full. Estimates only.

Name heritage (predicted origin)

Country: United Kingdom
Confidence: 90%

Special Thanks

A huge thank you to West Yorkshire Police for their tireless dedication in bringing this offender to justice. Your commitment and hard work truly help keep our communities safe, and we are deeply grateful.

Source: examinerlive.co.uk

Request a correction or removal

If anything on this page is inaccurate, out of date, or should no longer be published — for example, if an appeal has been granted, a conviction overturned, or reporting restrictions apply — please let us know and we will review it promptly.

Requests are reviewed by our team. Where a valid reason is provided we will remedy the situation as quickly as possible. Please include any supporting evidence or official source links to help us act fast.

Support Survivors

Behind every case is a real victim

Please consider donating to one of the UK's leading charities supporting survivors and preventing abuse. Two fantastic organisations making a real difference.

Important notice — this is not an official register

sexoffenders.co.uk is an independent, unofficial publication. We are not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, any government body, police force, or official sex offenders register. We research, write about, and republish information drawn from cases already reported in the media, published in court records, or released by police forces. We disclose our source for each entry where available.

Whilst we take care to be accurate, we cannot guarantee the completeness, currency, or ongoing accuracy of any information. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Users must not use information from this site to harass, intimidate, threaten, or otherwise harm any individual. Any such conduct may be unlawful.

If you believe any information is inaccurate, out of date, or requires removal for legal reasons (including reporting restrictions or matters involving a child), please use the correction form on the relevant offender page, or refer to our Privacy Policy for how to contact us. We will review all reports promptly.

By using this website you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.